FTC orders AI companies to dish on investments, partnerships and meetings.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued orders to Alphabet, Amazon, Anthropic, Microsoft, and OpenAI to provide information regarding recent investments and partnerships involving generative AI companies and major cloud service providers. The agency’s inquiry will scrutinize corporate partnerships and investments with AI providers to build a better internal understanding of these relationships and their impact on the competitive landscape . The FTC is seeking information specifically related to the strategic rationale of an investment/partnership, the practical implications of a specific partnership or investment, and the transactions’ competitive impact 1.

FTC Chair Lina Khan stated that “History shows that new technologies can create new markets and healthy competition. As companies race to develop and monetize AI, we must guard against tactics that foreclose this opportunity” .

It is important to note that no wrongdoing is alleged at this stage . However, it is just a little suspicious when companies already under investigation for antitrust practices, or who have been fined or settled regarding them, are apparently working to lock down the next big technology for their own use. The division between Anthropic (backed by Google and Amazon at billion-dollar levels) and OpenAI (backed by Microsoft at billion-dollar levels) is a proxy for the ambitions of the extant tech superpowers.

The FTC’s inquiry will help the agency deepen enforcers understanding of the investments and partnerships formed between generative AI developers and cloud service providers

It is important to note that no wrongdoing is alleged at this stage. However, it is just a little suspicious when companies already under investigation for antitrust practices, or who have been fined or settled regarding them, are apparently working to lock down the next big technology for their own use. The division between Anthropic (backed by Google and Amazon at billion-dollar levels) and OpenAI (backed by Microsoft at billion-dollar levels) is a proxy for the ambitions of the extant tech superpowers.

The FTC’s inquiry will help the agency deepen enforcers understanding of the investments and partnerships formed between generative AI developers and cloud service providers. The FTC is seeking information specifically related to:

  • Partnerships, investments, and the “strategic rationale” for them.
  • Whether these partnerships have “practical implications” such as when or how new products are released.
  • What they talk about at meetings.
  • Any analysis they have conducted about competitive impact of these transactions on competition, market share, etc.
  • How the partnerships shape competition for AI-specific resources (such as compute power, presumably).
  • Anything provided to other government entities (foreign or domestic) regarding these things.

No doubt this will be derided by the companies in question as a fishing expedition into totally benign business relationships. After all, why shouldn’t companies that have already spent billions pursuing AI spend a few more to prop up promising — but diametrically opposed — new challengers? 

After publication, Microsoft told TechCrunch in a statement that its OpenAI deal is “promoting competition and accelerating innovation”. Google, for its part, took the opportunity to trash Microsoft with a passive-aggressive swipe at its strategy. Both purport to welcome the inquiry.

Incidentally, today the FTC is hosting a summit on AI and its opportunities and dangers, in the sense of markets and startups. In her opening remarks, Khan noted that training AI models “further incentivizes surveillance,” which is of course the business model adopted by Google, Meta, et al. over the last decade or so, and that companies “can’t use claims of innovation as cover for law-breaking” .

To paraphrase a proverb, an inquiry in time saves nine down the line. Whether this leads to further action on the Commission’s part is anyone’s guess at this point, but the inquiry serves as notice that these companies are being watched 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top